<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Explorer Memory usage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/internet-explorer-memory-usage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/internet-explorer-memory-usage/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta2-9638</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: scotty</title>
		<link>http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/internet-explorer-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-117966</link>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 04:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/ie-memory-usage/#comment-117966</guid>
		<description>Sometimes having a choice to have the new window running in the same or different processes is actually a "good thing".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you click on the Internet Explorer icon, it actually launches a new instance. Moreover, each IE instance manages its own pool of session cookies, which is *extremely* useful in web application development, where you might want to log into the same app as different users as the same time to test interactivity. You can't easily do that with Firefox, as all windows share the same cookie jar. But with IE, as it gives you this option to create two windows as different instances with differnet cookie jar, that creates a whole lot of possibilities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And of course, if you want to preserve memory, Ctrl-N will do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes having a choice to have the new window running in the same or different processes is actually a &#8220;good thing&#8221;.</p>
<p>If you click on the Internet Explorer icon, it actually launches a new instance. Moreover, each IE instance manages its own pool of session cookies, which is *extremely* useful in web application development, where you might want to log into the same app as different users as the same time to test interactivity. You can&#8217;t easily do that with Firefox, as all windows share the same cookie jar. But with IE, as it gives you this option to create two windows as different instances with differnet cookie jar, that creates a whole lot of possibilities.</p>
<p>And of course, if you want to preserve memory, Ctrl-N will do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Rahn</title>
		<link>http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/internet-explorer-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-117965</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 17:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/ie-memory-usage/#comment-117965</guid>
		<description>Very interesting. Thanks for the info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. Thanks for the info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/internet-explorer-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-117964</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 16:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/ie-memory-usage/#comment-117964</guid>
		<description>It would seem that Firefox always seems to spawn off the same process, so it doesn't have the option.  That is a good point though, if you're doing stuff that could crash IE, opening different processes would be handy.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course *using* IE is something that can cause it to crash :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would seem that Firefox always seems to spawn off the same process, so it doesn&#8217;t have the option.  That is a good point though, if you&#8217;re doing stuff that could crash IE, opening different processes would be handy.  </p>
<p>Of course *using* IE is something that can cause it to crash <img src='http://blog.slaven.net.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/internet-explorer-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-117963</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 16:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/ie-memory-usage/#comment-117963</guid>
		<description>That may not be such a bad thing.  I have had cases where a site (usually associated with hacking) may cause a PC to either lockup or may open so many popups that it's a losing battle to close them all.  Killing the process in Task Manager kills the offending window along with all its popups.  A new IE window started with the icon, however, will not be killed at this stage.  From what you say, Firefox will not operate in this way.  (I use Firefox, BTW.  Tabs are too handy to go without...)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and it's good to see World Community Grid running away happily there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That may not be such a bad thing.  I have had cases where a site (usually associated with hacking) may cause a PC to either lockup or may open so many popups that it&#8217;s a losing battle to close them all.  Killing the process in Task Manager kills the offending window along with all its popups.  A new IE window started with the icon, however, will not be killed at this stage.  From what you say, Firefox will not operate in this way.  (I use Firefox, BTW.  Tabs are too handy to go without&#8230;)</p>
<p>Oh, and it&#8217;s good to see World Community Grid running away happily there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scotty</title>
		<link>http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/internet-explorer-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 13:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/ie-memory-usage/#comment-562</guid>
		<description>Sometimes having a choice to have the new window running in the same or different processes is actually a "good thing".

If you click on the Internet Explorer icon, it actually launches a new instance. Moreover, each IE instance manages its own pool of session cookies, which is *extremely* useful in web application development, where you might want to log into the same app as different users as the same time to test interactivity. You can't easily do that with Firefox, as all windows share the same cookie jar. But with IE, as it gives you this option to create two windows as different instances with differnet cookie jar, that creates a whole lot of possibilities.

And of course, if you want to preserve memory, Ctrl-N will do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes having a choice to have the new window running in the same or different processes is actually a &#8220;good thing&#8221;.</p>
<p>If you click on the Internet Explorer icon, it actually launches a new instance. Moreover, each IE instance manages its own pool of session cookies, which is *extremely* useful in web application development, where you might want to log into the same app as different users as the same time to test interactivity. You can&#8217;t easily do that with Firefox, as all windows share the same cookie jar. But with IE, as it gives you this option to create two windows as different instances with differnet cookie jar, that creates a whole lot of possibilities.</p>
<p>And of course, if you want to preserve memory, Ctrl-N will do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Rahn</title>
		<link>http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/internet-explorer-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 02:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/ie-memory-usage/#comment-561</guid>
		<description>Very interesting. Thanks for the info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. Thanks for the info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/internet-explorer-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 01:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/ie-memory-usage/#comment-558</guid>
		<description>It would seem that Firefox always seems to spawn off the same process, so it doesn't have the option.  That is a good point though, if you're doing stuff that could crash IE, opening different processes would be handy.  

Of course *using* IE is something that can cause it to crash :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would seem that Firefox always seems to spawn off the same process, so it doesn&#8217;t have the option.  That is a good point though, if you&#8217;re doing stuff that could crash IE, opening different processes would be handy.  </p>
<p>Of course *using* IE is something that can cause it to crash <img src='http://blog.slaven.net.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/internet-explorer-memory-usage/comment-page-1/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 01:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2005/05/03/ie-memory-usage/#comment-557</guid>
		<description>That may not be such a bad thing.  I have had cases where a site (usually associated with hacking) may cause a PC to either lockup or may open so many popups that it's a losing battle to close them all.  Killing the process in Task Manager kills the offending window along with all its popups.  A new IE window started with the icon, however, will not be killed at this stage.  From what you say, Firefox will not operate in this way.  (I use Firefox, BTW.  Tabs are too handy to go without...)

Oh, and it's good to see World Community Grid running away happily there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That may not be such a bad thing.  I have had cases where a site (usually associated with hacking) may cause a PC to either lockup or may open so many popups that it&#8217;s a losing battle to close them all.  Killing the process in Task Manager kills the offending window along with all its popups.  A new IE window started with the icon, however, will not be killed at this stage.  From what you say, Firefox will not operate in this way.  (I use Firefox, BTW.  Tabs are too handy to go without&#8230;)</p>
<p>Oh, and it&#8217;s good to see World Community Grid running away happily there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
